I keep seeing people complain how BaS "changed" or even "ruined" lore details that Bioshock 1 and Bioshock 2 already established. People keep saying how Burial At Sea has plot holes, especially in relation to Suchong and the Big Daddies. Well, I propose, and with evidence from B1 and B2 themselves, that no, Burial At Sea did NOT change the lore.
It was definitely the main theme of Burial At Sea. Feeling the unfairness and cruelty of the situation is exactly how Elizabeth felt about Sally. It also drives home the idea of Rapture being a flawed concept from the start, because it is a society where nobody cares about anyone but themselves.
The difference with Burial at Sea, Levine explained, was the amount of time and effort needed to re-create Rapture within the BioShock Infinite engine. "We had a choice. The plot is not a mess. There are no plot holes in Infinite or Burial at Sea, just people that prefer not having to think. I agree that Infinite is pretty straight forward, and has no plot major plot holes I can think of, besides Comstock becoming a major political figure in his teens somehow and raising Columbia. But I can't say the same for For BioShock Infinite on the Xbox 360, a GameFAQs message board topic titled "Bioshock Buried at Sea story explained SPOILERS". In a Caesar cipher, if the shift index is 1, all the letters in the alphabet are to be shifted by 1 letter. So A=B, B=C, C=D and DAWN becomes EBXO. If the shift index is 2, A=C, B=D, C=E and DAWN becomes FCYP . You can easily break a Caesar cipher even by hand as there are only 25 possible code alphabets. . 308 81 289 193 221 164 320 112 362

bioshock burial at sea explained